- Oct 10, 2014
-
-
Oleg Nenashev authored
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenashev@gmail.com>
-
Oleg Nenashev authored
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenashev@gmail.com>
-
Jesse Glick authored
-
- Oct 09, 2014
-
-
Jesse Glick authored
[FIXED JENKINS-25074] Make sure to call Job.getBuildHealthReports just once per t:buildHealth render.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Based on the reaction to these issues and JENKINS-24514, I'm partially reverting the original change, and bringing the umask default back to 022. The configurable option does enable the user to choose a different umask, so I think I can still claim that JENKINS-24514 is addressed.
-
- Oct 08, 2014
-
-
Jesse Glick authored
-
Jesse Glick authored
-
- Oct 06, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Oct 02, 2014
-
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
- Oct 01, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Sep 29, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Sep 25, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
The primary change is that the thread name update code now lives in a filter instead of 'Stapler' servlet, so it happens a lot earlier.
-
- Sep 24, 2014
-
-
Jesse Glick authored
[FIXED JENKINS-22769] ItemListener callbacks should run as SYSTEM since they sometimes do ACL-checked calls.
-
Nicolas De Loof authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
The actual fix is made in 040b7d40 through winp.
-
- Sep 23, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
This version checks the critical flag of the process, as killing such a process results in BSoD.
-
- Sep 22, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Sep 18, 2014
-
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Sep 17, 2014
-
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
- Sep 15, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Integrated the fix in remoting to Jenkins 1.580.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Sep 14, 2014
-
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
- Sep 13, 2014
-
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
- Sep 08, 2014
-
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
- Sep 06, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
Daniel Beck authored
-
- Sep 01, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Aug 30, 2014
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Ubuntu (at least as of 12.04) has the default umask 022, which made some users nervous. Quoting its /etc/login.defs below, which explains its historical origin: UMASK is the default umask value for pam_umask and is used by useradd and newusers to set the mode of the new home directories. 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her mind. It does seem to me that a bit more restrictive default is sensible, so this change introduces /etc/default/jenkins parameter that sets the default umask to 027 to prevent "others" from seeing files. Not that keys and other sensitive files are protected anyway, so it is not the case that the privacy of Jenkins data files have been vulnerable prior to this change.
-
Jesse Glick authored
[FIXED JENKINS-23522] Defend against stack overflows when a listener (unnecessarily) called super from a deprecated method. Fixes #1295 a little differently.
-