- Jul 24, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jul 23, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jul 19, 2012
-
-
Jesse Glick authored
-
- Jul 11, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jul 10, 2012
-
-
Jesse Glick authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jul 06, 2012
-
-
Jesse Glick authored
-
- Jul 05, 2012
-
-
Jesse Glick authored
Introduced AbstractProject.supportsMakeDisabled rather than using trick of checking for parent instanceof Jenkins. Extracted common GUI into makeDisabled.jelly, with accompanying I18N refactoring. Also moved all this into AbstractProject, where the relevant methods are defined, rather than Job where they are not.
-
- Jul 02, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 28, 2012
-
-
Olivier Lamy authored
-
- Jun 25, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 24, 2012
-
-
Christoph Kutzinski authored
-
- Jun 22, 2012
-
-
Andrey Myatlyuk authored
[FIXED JENKINS-13695]
-
- Jun 20, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Preserve in-progress builds when reloading a job. Because in-flight builds tend to update the state a lot, with this change we refrain from reloading those builds from the disk. This should be acceptable since we are primarily reloading a job, and reloading of builds are secondary.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
All top-level jobs show up in search, as opposed to just jobs in the current view or in the primary view.
-
- Jun 19, 2012
-
-
Nicolas De Loof authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Nicolas De Loof authored
This reverts commit ebc6af72.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 16, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
The actual meat of the change is in remoting.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
I couldn't quite find one place to do this, so it's spread apart somewhat.
-
- Jun 15, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 13, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
I should have known better than reusing the version number. Apparently the issue isn't just in Maven.
-
- Jun 12, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Stack trace: org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.ReactorException: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method hudson.security.SecurityRealm.findBean(Ljava/lang/Class;Lorg/springframework/context/ApplicationContext;)Ljava/lang/Object; from class hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm$LDAPUserDetailsService at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor.execute(Reactor.java:246) at jenkins.InitReactorRunner.run(InitReactorRunner.java:43) at jenkins.model.Jenkins.executeReactor(Jenkins.java:885) at jenkins.model.Jenkins.<init>(Jenkins.java:790) at hudson.model.Hudson.<init>(Hudson.java:81) at hudson.model.Hudson.<init>(Hudson.java:77) at hudson.WebAppMain$2.run(WebAppMain.java:217) Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method hudson.security.SecurityRealm.findBean(Ljava/lang/Class;Lorg/springframework/context/ApplicationContext;)Ljava/lang/Object; from class hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm$LDAPUserDetailsService at hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm$LDAPUserDetailsService.<init>(LDAPSecurityRealm.java:419) at hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm.createSecurityComponents(LDAPSecurityRealm.java:369) at hudson.security.SecurityRealm.getSecurityComponents(SecurityRealm.java:398) at hudson.security.HudsonFilter.reset(HudsonFilter.java:134) at jenkins.model.Jenkins.setSecurityRealm(Jenkins.java:1960) at jenkins.model.Jenkins$17.run(Jenkins.java:2524) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.TaskGraphBuilder$TaskImpl.run(TaskGraphBuilder.java:146) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor.runTask(Reactor.java:259) at jenkins.model.Jenkins$7.runTask(Jenkins.java:874) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor$2.run(Reactor.java:187) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor$Node.run(Reactor.java:94) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
-
- Jun 11, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 09, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 07, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 06, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Vincent Latombe authored
When managing instances with lots of jobs, the size of the view configuration screen becomes huge because there is one line per job on the instance.
-