- Jun 19, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 13, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Conflicts: changelog.html
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
I should have known better than reusing the version number. Apparently the issue isn't just in Maven.
-
- Jun 12, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Conflicts: changelog.html
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Stack trace: org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.ReactorException: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method hudson.security.SecurityRealm.findBean(Ljava/lang/Class;Lorg/springframework/context/ApplicationContext;)Ljava/lang/Object; from class hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm$LDAPUserDetailsService at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor.execute(Reactor.java:246) at jenkins.InitReactorRunner.run(InitReactorRunner.java:43) at jenkins.model.Jenkins.executeReactor(Jenkins.java:885) at jenkins.model.Jenkins.<init>(Jenkins.java:790) at hudson.model.Hudson.<init>(Hudson.java:81) at hudson.model.Hudson.<init>(Hudson.java:77) at hudson.WebAppMain$2.run(WebAppMain.java:217) Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method hudson.security.SecurityRealm.findBean(Ljava/lang/Class;Lorg/springframework/context/ApplicationContext;)Ljava/lang/Object; from class hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm$LDAPUserDetailsService at hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm$LDAPUserDetailsService.<init>(LDAPSecurityRealm.java:419) at hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm.createSecurityComponents(LDAPSecurityRealm.java:369) at hudson.security.SecurityRealm.getSecurityComponents(SecurityRealm.java:398) at hudson.security.HudsonFilter.reset(HudsonFilter.java:134) at jenkins.model.Jenkins.setSecurityRealm(Jenkins.java:1960) at jenkins.model.Jenkins$17.run(Jenkins.java:2524) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.TaskGraphBuilder$TaskImpl.run(TaskGraphBuilder.java:146) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor.runTask(Reactor.java:259) at jenkins.model.Jenkins$7.runTask(Jenkins.java:874) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor$2.run(Reactor.java:187) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor$Node.run(Reactor.java:94) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
-
- Jun 11, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
This is a precautionary measure against those Maven proxies that might have already cached 1.469 binaries while they were out.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Conflicts: war/pom.xml
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 09, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 08, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
AggregatedTestResultAction remembers the exact build # of the child build, so honor that number, and don't let MatrixBuild.getRunFor(Configuration) picks up some earlier run. The problem was discovered in the following situation: - there's a matrix project M with single configuration X - M #868 run normally, with 69 failures. - M #869 run with 258 failures, and that was reported in MatrixTestResult.add(AbstractTestResultAction), updating the total count. - but for whatever reason, X #869 is lost - now if you look at M #869 test report, you'll see 258 as the total count, but the detail drill down would show 69, from X #868. ---- (05:25:57 PM) veebers: Hi all, I have an odd issue with the 'test results' (05:26:12 PM) veebers: In this result: Test Result (258 failures / +189) where could the +189 come from? (05:26:20 PM) veebers: I can only actually see 69 failed tests :P (05:26:48 PM) kohsuke: it means comparing to the last test result, you got 189 more failure (05:27:37 PM) veebers: ah ok, but how can I have +189 failing tests when there are only 69 failed this time around? (05:28:21 PM) kohsuke: I wonder if it cuts off the summary display at 70 (out of your 258 failures)? (05:29:48 PM) veebers: Hmmm, kohsuke I don't know about that. Clicking the 'show all failed tests' only shows 69 tests :P (05:30:22 PM) veebers: and when I look at a prev. failing test, one that has ~200 fails (05:30:24 PM) veebers: it shows the lot (05:31:07 PM) kohsuke: veebers: want to do the screenshot? (05:34:59 PM) veebers: kohsuke: sure: http://static.inky.ws/image/2143/image.jpg (05:35:40 PM) kohsuke: this is a matrix project that just has one configuration? (05:35:49 PM) kohsuke: Or is it a partial re-run? (05:35:53 PM) mode (+o abayer) by ChanServ (05:36:46 PM) veebers: first option. Only one config (05:37:56 PM) kohsuke: I wonder if this is some kind of rendering gritch (05:38:06 PM) kohsuke: perhaps if somehow it's showing the data of the previous run? (05:38:24 PM) kohsuke: 69+189=258 can't be a coincidence (05:38:53 PM) kohsuke: is this instance publicly visible? (05:39:25 PM) veebers: err not that one, just checking if the results are published to the public one (05:41:16 PM) veebers: hmm, that's odd. The publicly avail. one isn't showing the right details :P (05:41:24 PM) kohsuke: URL? (05:41:26 PM) veebers: well, perhaps there is something screwy with that setup (05:42:14 PM) veebers: kohsuke: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/dx-autopilot-run/869/ (05:43:33 PM) veebers: kohsuke: although I don't think that's going to be much help as that gives me a 500 error :P (05:43:45 PM) kohsuke: that's a bug of its own (05:43:51 PM) kohsuke: I think I can fix that one (05:50:29 PM) kohsuke: veebers: I think I have a hypothesis (05:51:00 PM) kohsuke: when you do click that 69 failed tests reported under a configuration, I suspect you'll be actually taken to the different build number (05:51:23 PM) kohsuke: likely the same configuration build of the previous one (05:53:02 PM) veebers: kohsuke: hmm, not sure that's it. (05:53:10 PM) veebers: it's the same build number all over (05:53:53 PM) kohsuke: I'm pretty sure that's it (05:54:01 PM) kohsuke: let me think of other ways to prove this (05:54:27 PM) veebers: sure (05:54:36 PM) kohsuke: try /job/dx-autopilot-run/869/label=1EBEE0FF-DAC9-11DF-BBDA-64A98C34D485/parentBuild/ (05:54:43 PM) kohsuke: and I predict you'll see #868 in the UI (05:54:45 PM) veebers: so, the public page there says: Test Result (258 failures / +189) (05:55:16 PM) veebers: When I click that link in the private server it takes me to that report you saw in the screenshot (05:55:43 PM) veebers: which says: .../869/testReport/ (05:55:52 PM) veebers: and any other link on that page references 869 (05:56:04 PM) veebers: so perhaps it's somewhere in the background that might be accessing a prev build? (05:56:36 PM) veebers: i.e. whatever builds up the top graph bar (at the top of the page) in server end rendering? (05:56:50 PM) kohsuke: does /job/dx-autopilot-run/869/ show gray ball? (05:57:27 PM) veebers: no, it shows the default config (05:57:37 PM) veebers: (yeah, something is wrong with the public facing one :P) (05:59:29 PM) veebers: not sure why you can't click through (06:00:40 PM) veebers: kohsuke: ah, looks like you are correct (06:00:50 PM) veebers: I was looking in the wrong place (06:01:01 PM) veebers: kohsuke: d'oh, thanks for pointing that out :) (06:01:41 PM) kohsuke: OK, I understand what happened (06:02:38 PM) veebers: so yeah, clicking on that config, I can see the line: Started by upstream project dx-autopilot-run build number 868 (06:04:37 PM) kohsuke: #869 really did have 258 failures, but for some reason Jenkins lost the record of it (06:05:02 PM) kohsuke: and when it's displaying this to you, it's approximating the lost record by using the nearest build, that was #868 (06:05:20 PM) kohsuke: and that's why the public instance, which runs ancient version of Jenkins, reports NPE (06:05:30 PM) kohsuke: this version doesn't have that approximation feature (06:05:42 PM) kohsuke: veebers: BTW you really should upgrade that publicly facing instance (06:06:00 PM) kohsuke: there have been some security advisories issued since then (06:06:11 PM) veebers: kohsuke: Makes sense, will get onto that (06:06:30 PM) kohsuke: I'm fixing this in the trunk so that it doesn't incorrectly approximate here (06:06:36 PM) veebers: nice
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 07, 2012
-
-
Seiji Sogabe authored
-
Nicolas De Loof authored
-
Nicolas De Loof authored
-