- Jun 16, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
I couldn't quite find one place to do this, so it's spread apart somewhat.
-
- Jun 15, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 13, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
I should have known better than reusing the version number. Apparently the issue isn't just in Maven.
-
- Jun 12, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Stack trace: org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.ReactorException: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method hudson.security.SecurityRealm.findBean(Ljava/lang/Class;Lorg/springframework/context/ApplicationContext;)Ljava/lang/Object; from class hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm$LDAPUserDetailsService at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor.execute(Reactor.java:246) at jenkins.InitReactorRunner.run(InitReactorRunner.java:43) at jenkins.model.Jenkins.executeReactor(Jenkins.java:885) at jenkins.model.Jenkins.<init>(Jenkins.java:790) at hudson.model.Hudson.<init>(Hudson.java:81) at hudson.model.Hudson.<init>(Hudson.java:77) at hudson.WebAppMain$2.run(WebAppMain.java:217) Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method hudson.security.SecurityRealm.findBean(Ljava/lang/Class;Lorg/springframework/context/ApplicationContext;)Ljava/lang/Object; from class hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm$LDAPUserDetailsService at hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm$LDAPUserDetailsService.<init>(LDAPSecurityRealm.java:419) at hudson.security.LDAPSecurityRealm.createSecurityComponents(LDAPSecurityRealm.java:369) at hudson.security.SecurityRealm.getSecurityComponents(SecurityRealm.java:398) at hudson.security.HudsonFilter.reset(HudsonFilter.java:134) at jenkins.model.Jenkins.setSecurityRealm(Jenkins.java:1960) at jenkins.model.Jenkins$17.run(Jenkins.java:2524) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.TaskGraphBuilder$TaskImpl.run(TaskGraphBuilder.java:146) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor.runTask(Reactor.java:259) at jenkins.model.Jenkins$7.runTask(Jenkins.java:874) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor$2.run(Reactor.java:187) at org.jvnet.hudson.reactor.Reactor$Node.run(Reactor.java:94) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
-
- Jun 11, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 09, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 07, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- Jun 06, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Vincent Latombe authored
When managing instances with lots of jobs, the size of the view configuration screen becomes huge because there is one line per job on the instance.
-
- Jun 05, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- May 31, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Going beyond this requires CSS animation.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- May 30, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
... since they didn't go to RC.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Previously, the presence of the xpath parameter suppressed the tree parameter processing. This change fixes that so that the tree parameter can be used for building small DOM, then XPath to manipulate the data further.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
fma1977 authored
Added test whether the currently checked slave computer actually can take the buildable item before flagging it as needed (avoids powering up and connecting to slaves for jobs they can't build).
-
murank authored
-
- May 29, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- May 25, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
It uses Diffie Hellman to come up with one-time session key, then have the server sign this session key to allow the client to verify that there's no man in the middle.
-
- May 24, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Until now, Jenkins.overallNodeProvisioner was tracking an inconsistent pair of numbers. On one hand, it was tracking all the executors in the system, but then it was also only tracking the # of free-roaming label-unassigned jobs as the queue length. So if all your slaves are set with Node.Mode.EXCLUSIVE and you have some free-roaming jobs, then it'll never tickle NodePrivisioner. In other words, the # of executors weren't reflecting the actual # of executors that can execute what's counted as the queue length. See the problem report at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/bUwGEgOwv4Q To fix this, I introduced another LoadStatistics that only counts the # of executors that can execute free-roaming jobs, and # of free-roaming jobs as the queue length. In this way, two pairs of numbers are consistent. This now allows us to use overallLoadStatistics for really the entire system, including all executors and the total queue length. This is primarily for administrators to see the resource utilization, and it is not useful for NodeProvisioner input because it's mixing too many different things. The semantics change in OverallLoadStatistics.queueLength allows us to deprecate its totalQueueLength field.
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
- May 23, 2012
-
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
Fall back in non-JNA case wasn't working.
-
Dave Hunt authored
-
Vincent Latombe authored
Backward compatibility is preventing the View.READ permission to apply correctly. It actually overrides the View.READ instead of complementing it. This change only applies default READ right if the View.READ is not available, and the user has View.CONFIGURE + the view is not empty.
-
Eric Dalquist authored
Include the file system path that was checked in the low disk space error message
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
The actual fix was in c86aa679
-
Kohsuke Kawaguchi authored
The previous implementation was always appending the per-configuration unique suffix, making it impossible for different configuration builds to share workspaces. In this fix, we introduce a secondary field to control the workspace of sub-builds (which can be either absolute or relative to the matrix head workspace.)
-
- May 22, 2012
-
-
Olivier Lamy authored
-