Use the GuardedBy import that the Jenkins core uses by convention
- We will never mind that this is probably the wrong import to use as Jenkins core is consistently using the wrong one (If anyone asks, for a `javax` import to be correct, it should have a JSR that has passed through voting and not have a JSR that is still subject to change... OTOH one could argue that if the JSR 305 should ever become revived from its current dormant state *and* it is decided to include in the JRE *then* the packages would get moved out of `javax` and into `java` so they are not in final form anyway... but that pre-supposes that the process of standardization does not modify the annotations and by virtue of being in `javax` there will be some special case handling by some classloaders which is why depending on the JSR305 versions is, in my view, a bad plan... anyway this is moot... Jenkins core is going with JSR305 as it currently stands so we call all go down together!)
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment