Loading README.md +10 −5 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -106,10 +106,11 @@ For hacking fork it from github. $ cd jsduck $ rake --tasks JsDuck depends on [json][] and [RDiscount][] plus [RSpec][] for tests. JsDuck depends on [json][], [RDiscount][], and [parallel][] plus [RSpec][] for tests. [json]: http://flori.github.com/json/ [RDiscount]: https://github.com/rtomayko/rdiscount [parallel]: https://github.com/grosser/parallel [RSpec]: http://rspec.info/ Loading Loading @@ -182,10 +183,6 @@ Missing features and TODO * Support for custom @tags. Ext-doc supports this, I personally have never used this feature, so I'm thinking it's not really needed. * Speed improvements. JsDuck is clearly slower than ext-doc, but I haven't so far done almost no optimizations, so there should be some pretty low-hanging fruits to pick. Copying ------- Loading @@ -198,6 +195,14 @@ JsDuck was developed by [Rene Saarsoo](http://triin.net). Changelog --------- * Development version * Significant peed improvements - most importantly utilizing multiple CPU-s (if available) to speed things up. On my 4-core box JsDuck is now even faster than ext-doc. * Printing of performance info in verbose mode * Support for comma-first coding style * Few other fixes to JavaScript parsing * 0.2 - most features of ext-doc supported. * Links from documentation to source code * Syntax highlighting of code examples Loading Loading
README.md +10 −5 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -106,10 +106,11 @@ For hacking fork it from github. $ cd jsduck $ rake --tasks JsDuck depends on [json][] and [RDiscount][] plus [RSpec][] for tests. JsDuck depends on [json][], [RDiscount][], and [parallel][] plus [RSpec][] for tests. [json]: http://flori.github.com/json/ [RDiscount]: https://github.com/rtomayko/rdiscount [parallel]: https://github.com/grosser/parallel [RSpec]: http://rspec.info/ Loading Loading @@ -182,10 +183,6 @@ Missing features and TODO * Support for custom @tags. Ext-doc supports this, I personally have never used this feature, so I'm thinking it's not really needed. * Speed improvements. JsDuck is clearly slower than ext-doc, but I haven't so far done almost no optimizations, so there should be some pretty low-hanging fruits to pick. Copying ------- Loading @@ -198,6 +195,14 @@ JsDuck was developed by [Rene Saarsoo](http://triin.net). Changelog --------- * Development version * Significant peed improvements - most importantly utilizing multiple CPU-s (if available) to speed things up. On my 4-core box JsDuck is now even faster than ext-doc. * Printing of performance info in verbose mode * Support for comma-first coding style * Few other fixes to JavaScript parsing * 0.2 - most features of ext-doc supported. * Links from documentation to source code * Syntax highlighting of code examples Loading