diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 23444f72731a9613ebc203827eb9ad5ccdb6701e..62461a07499cf61c01b580ed5c57ed32ab1ed91b 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ Basically JsDuck thinks that the following doc-comment really sucks:
      * <li><code>{@link Ext.form.TextField#stripCharsRe stripCharsRe}</code> :
      * filter characters after being typed in, but before being validated</li>
      * </ul></div>
+     *
+     * @constructor Creates a new TextField
+     * @param {Object} config Configuration options
+     *
+     * @xtype textfield
      */
     Ext.form.TextField = Ext.extend(Ext.form.Field,  {
 
@@ -69,13 +74,17 @@ it would like that you wrote comments like that instead:
      *   filter out keystrokes before any validation occurs
      * - `{@link Ext.form.TextField#stripCharsRe stripCharsRe}` :
      *   filter characters after being typed in, but before being validated
+     *
+     * @xtype textfield
      */
     Ext.form.TextField = Ext.extend(Ext.form.Field,  {
 
 As you can see, JsDuck supports formatting comments with friendly
 [Markdown][] syntax.  And it can infer several things from the code
 (like @class and @extends in this case), so you don't have to repeat
-yourself.
+yourself.  Also the constructor documentation is inherited from parent
+class - so you don't have to restate that it takes a config object
+again.
 
 That's basically it.  Have fun.
 
@@ -121,7 +130,6 @@ currently missing:
 * List of subclasses
 * Tree of parent classes
 * Syntax highlighting of code examples
-* Constructor first in methods list
 * Search, not just searching from official ExtJS documentation
 * Support for custom @tags
 
diff --git a/lib/jsduck/class.rb b/lib/jsduck/class.rb
index 951cf2998c0824e3067c1e493bf68a22b2d8f551..a95744a5e6cbf778a9844831c9107597d75bf920 100644
--- a/lib/jsduck/class.rb
+++ b/lib/jsduck/class.rb
@@ -25,9 +25,30 @@ module JsDuck
     end
 
     # Returns array of all public members of particular type in a class,
-    # sorted by name.  See members_hash for details.
+    # sorted by name.
+    #
+    # For methods the the constructor is listed as first method having
+    # the same name as class itself.
+    #
+    # See members_hash for details.
     def members(type)
-      members_hash(type).values.sort {|a,b| a[:name] <=> b[:name] }
+      ms = members_hash(type).values.sort {|a,b| a[:name] <=> b[:name] }
+      type == :method ? constructor_first(ms) : ms
+    end
+
+    # If methods list contains constructor, rename it with class name
+    # and move into beginning of methods list.
+    def constructor_first(ms)
+      constr = ms.find {|m| m[:name] == "constructor" }
+      if constr
+        ms.delete(constr)
+        # Clone it.  Otherwise the search for "constructor" from this
+        # class will return nothing as we have renamed it.
+        constr2 = constr.clone
+        constr2[:name] = short_name
+        ms.unshift(constr2)
+      end
+      ms
     end
 
     # Returns hash of public members of class (and parent classes).
diff --git a/spec/class_spec.rb b/spec/class_spec.rb
index 5ad5fd4490ded875d75dca024ae83ec60d845ba4..be2738842d75edd50c458ce7c7542f86532dbca7 100644
--- a/spec/class_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/class_spec.rb
@@ -43,6 +43,33 @@ describe JsDuck::Class do
     end
   end
 
+  describe "#members(:method)" do
+    before do
+      @classes = {}
+      @parent = JsDuck::Class.new({
+          :name => "ParentClass",
+          :method => [
+            {:name => "baz", :member => "ParentClass"},
+            {:name => "constructor", :member => "ParentClass"},
+          ]
+        }, @classes);
+      @classes["ParentClass"] = @parent
+      @child = JsDuck::Class.new({
+          :name => "ChildClass",
+          :extends => "ParentClass",
+          :method => [
+            {:name => "foo", :member => "ChildClass"}
+          ]
+        }, @classes);
+      @classes["ChildClass"] = @child
+    end
+
+    it "returns constructor as first method" do
+      ms = @child.members(:method)
+      ms.first[:name].should == "ChildClass"
+    end
+  end
+
   describe "#inherits_from" do
 
     before do